MODERN INDIGENOUS WARS – THE COLONIALIST BEAT GOES ON!
“In 1990, the OKA crisis brought Native resistance to the forefront of mainstream Canadian media. As the standoff continued, the global media informed the world of Canada’s Aboriginal dealings, or lack thereof with all First Nations….Almost any land claim issue…is tied to hundreds of years of broken promises (treaties) from the government, territorial infringement, forced values on traditional Native cultures….This continued disrespect and deaf ear of the Canadian and U.S. governments has pushed Bands/Tribes of people to go to extremes to be heard. When a “crisis” or forceful resistance occurs it is almost always the last straw. The media make it out to be something new or an isolated incident but that is almost never the case.”
Are First Nations Imagined Within the Construction of Canada? Michelle Jack, 2005. http://www.libarts.wsu.edu/amerst/michellejack/PDF%20Read%20Files/Oka.Final.pdf |
SETON PORTAGE 1990 SETON LAKE NATIVE FIRST NATIONS Demonstrating support of the Mohawks at OKA
In August, 1990, the Seton Portage railway was blockaded by the Seton Lake First NatIon in solidarity with the Mohawk and the OKA crisis. The B.C. Premier at the time, William Vander Zaim, came calling ostensibly to find a peaceful resolution. Instead, shortly thereafter, the blockade was dismantled by the R.C.M.P. It did not end there, however, media interest was on the rise all across Canada as regard Native unrest, and the intense media coverage resulted in the increase in protests all across the country with regard to land claim issues. |
GUSTAFSON LAKE & THE SHUSHWAP, June 15-September 17, 1995 – 31 days Gustafson was one of the largest police actions in Canadian history, involving over four hundred officers pitted against twenty-one Sun dancers. The racism and violence on the part of government authorities was beyond the pale. The story begins at Gustafson Lake (over 350 km north of Vancouver) in 1995 when the R.C.M.P ignored raised questions regarding American Rancher, Lyle James’ claim to the ownership of a piece of land. Rancher James tried to intimidate the Shushwap protestors into leaving what they claim was unceded land. The land, was their “Sundance territory” and oral history backed up their claim. The R.C.M.P., without investigation simply cordoned off the land isolating the Native protestors. Clearly negotiation and diplomacy were not on the table. In September, 1995, the Force upped the ante and brought in the heavy artillery in the form of armored personnel carriers (APM) borrowed from the army. A comedy of errors ensued on the part of the R.C.M.P as they tried to subdue the 65-year old leader, organic farmer, William James Ignace, (his Shushwap name, Wolverine). Elder Ignace is well-versed in Constitutional Law and its application to Native rights. Later, he recited part of the Royal Proclamation of 1763, “aboriginal people cannot legally be molested or disturbed by newcomer governments, their courts or their citizens, not upon any Lands whatever which were not ceded to the crown.” The Proclamation is very clear on the process of ceding land. It must be done in a public place in front of witnesses and then recorded “in a contract that describes with legal accuracy the land being ceded” with both sides agreeing to the result. None of this took place as regards the disputed land. Both the Proclamation and the 1982 Constitution were ignored by the British Columbia government. As two R.C.M.P attempted to shoot two Native men who were swimming back to the camp, Wolverine stepped forward and fired shots over the armored personnel carrier causing the officers to duck for cover. Corporal Preston of the R.C.M.P then ordered the Elder “taken out”, presumably meaning kill him. This was attempted by trying to run him over with another APC. Using basic escape maneuvers, the Elder dodged and wove leading the APC away from his friends. The Elder fired a shot that disabled the hydraulic line of the APC disabling it to the point that it became mired in mud. This was shaping up to be a really bad Hollywood western, with American cattlemen at odds with the Natives. It would have been be funny if the stakes were not so high! B.C. Attorney General, Ujjal Dosanjh (ironically, the other kind of ‘Indian’), was heard to make all sorts of inflammatory remarks and ended up exacerbating the whole crisis in a bid to be seen as a ‘law and order’ guy. His incorrect claims that included the Shushwap running after the R.C.M.P with intent to kill were not only lies, but racist. Again the irony of who is speaking these lies should not be lost on the readers of this page. Even though, former R.C.M.P. Officer, Bob Woods, advised that there should be no armed attack, the bloodlust was high, and his recommendations ignored. Over twenty thousand shots were fired, one hundred and four returned by the protestors. The R.C.M.P. spin doctors rewrote history turning the situation in a “random Indian uprising.” Court documents and precise notes taken by one Reporter who was also arrested, indicate otherwise. It was simply another overly aggressive attempt on the part of the police to assert their will and look like defenders of the realm as they tried to put down twenty-one sun dancers. It carries shades of the 1890 massacre at Wounded Knee, when the 7th cavalry angered at their losses at the Battle of the Little Big Horn in 1876, killed over three hundred women, and children just because they could. Later some of the soldiers were given medals by the U.S. government. Eventually the Force retreated and on September 17, 2005, the protestors left the land peacefully. Arrests ensued. Fourteen indigenous and four non-native supporters were charged following the siege, fifteen of whom were found guilty and sentenced to jail terms ranging from six months to eight years. The leader of the occupation, William “Wolverine” Jones Ignace, was found guilty of mischief to property, mischief causing danger to life, possession of firearms and explosives, discharging a firearm at police, and using a firearm to assault police officers. He was sentenced to eight and a half years, but was released in 1999, Three of the defendants appealed the verdicts on the grounds that the Canadian courts have no jurisdiction over the lands where the Gustafsen Lake standoff took place, which they claimed remain unceded indigenous land. The Supreme Court of British Columbia refused to hear the appeal. A public enquiry into the siege continues to be demanded. |
BURNT CHURCH MI’KMAQ 2000-2001
In September 1999, a Supreme Court ruling (R.v. Marshall) acknowledged that treaties from the 1770s held that a Mi’kmaq, Donald Marshall Jr., had the right to fish for eels out of season. The Burnt Church First Nation interpreted the judgment as meaning that they could catch lobster out of season and began to put out traps. The non-Native fishermen claimed that if this is allowed lobster stocks (an important source of income) could be depleted. The following is from CBC News Online, May 8, 2004 On Sept. 17, 1999, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the Native fishing rights of Donald Marshall, a Mi’kmaq who had been charged with fishing eels out of season, fishing without a license, and fishing with an illegal net. Marshall had been convicted on all three counts in Provincial Court. The conviction was upheld by the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal. He then took his case to the Supreme Court, arguing treaties from the 1760s gave him the right to catch fish for sale and excused him from current fisheries regulations. The Supreme Court agreed. It stated in its decision that “…nothing less would uphold the honour and integrity of the Crown in its dealings with the Mi’kmaq people to secure their peace and friendship…” But the Marshall decision caused chaos as parties on all sides of the debate interpreted the ruling differently. The 34 native bands in the Maritime provinces and eastern Quebec that were affected by the decision immediately began fishing lobster out of season, saying the ruling gave them full, unregulated fishing rights. Non-Indigenous fishermen demanded the government put a ban on the catch, worried that lobster stocks would be lost. Burnt Church and Indian Brook The demonstration turned to an ugly shouting match when the boats returned, having destroyed hundreds of Native traps. The vandalization of fishing equipment and three fish plants followed. Despite the violence, the Native fishermen of Burnt Church didn’t budge, refusing to give up their fishing rights granted by the Marshall decision. Mi’kmaq warriors set up an armed encampment on the wharf in Burnt Church to protect their fisherman. Days later, Fisheries Minister Herb Dhaliwal met with Native leaders to try to find a way to ease the tensions. All but two of the 34 First Nations bands agreed to a voluntary moratorium on fishing. The Burnt Church and Indian Brook bands rejected the idea of government regulation. The moratorium succeeded in defusing the tensions, at least for the time being. On Oct. 18, 1999, the West Nova Fishermen’s Coalition applied for a rehearing of the appeal and asked for the judgment to be set aside until a new hearing. On Nov. 17, 1999, the Supreme Court ruled there would be no rehearing. However, to alleviate the confusion, the Court released a new ruling, known as Marshall 2, to clarify points made in the original Marshall decision. Negotiations slow. In February 2000, negotiations between Indigenous communities in the Atlantic Provinces and the DFO began, with Fisheries Minister, Herb Dhaliwal promising to ink a short-term deal by the spring. The deal would decide how resources would be shared. But negotiations took longer than he thought. Dhaliwal also met with commercial fishermen, some of whom were considering selling their licenses and getting out of the business. The Maritime Fishermen’s Union criticized the government, saying the DFO was dragging its heels. Native fishermen were also getting frustrated. First Nations leaders announced their people would be out fishing in the spring whether or not a deal had been struck. On Feb. 24, 2000, the federal government announced it would buy back more than 1,000 commercial fishing licenses, including boats and gear, to expand the Native lobster fishery. By the summer, about 1,400 fishermen had offered to retire more than 5,000 licenses. In the federal budget announced in February 2000, $160 million was set aside for the DFO’s response to the Marshall decision. The money would pay for retired licenses and economic development initiatives aimed at helping to bring Native people into the fishing industry. The interim agreements Over the following two months, the negotiations saw real progress as the first Native bands signed agreements with the government. By April 21, 2000, 13 bands signed deals and others made agreements in principle. The interim deals were different for each band, taking into account the different sizes and interests of the various groups, but they were generally set out to govern fishing over the next year. They gave Native people the same access as non-Natives to commercial and food fisheries, providing boats, gear, training and economic development initiatives, like new equipment or facilities. Some bands incorporated the new deals with the Aboriginal Fisheries Strategy, AFS, while others opted to keep the agreements separate. Established in 1992 to ensure stable fishery management, the AFS was in response to the Supreme Court of Canada 1990 Sparrow decision that defined Aboriginal Peoples’ right to fish for food, social and ceremonial purposes. By August 2000, 27 bands had signed agreements, but the Burnt Church and Indian Brook bands still refused. The fishing continued In a two-week period in late July and early August 2000, seven boats belonging to the Indian Brook band were seized and 18 people were arrested on charges of catching too many lobsters. The Mi’kmaq said they didn’t need the government to make sure the lobster population is conserved because they already have their own conservation methods in place. The Burnt Church Mi’kmaq held their position as well. On Aug. 9, 2000, the band members voted to reject federal regulation of the fishery despite the government’s offer to provide five well-equipped boats and build a new $2-million wharf. Ottawa wanted to set a 40-trap limit but the band said it has the right to set more than 5,000 traps. The following week, tensions rose again in Burnt Church as enraged Mi’kmaq declared war against the DFO after a late-night raid on several lobster traps in Miramichi Bay. Four people were arrested, and one boat and over 700 traps were seized. Native fishermen protested by setting up a blockade on Highway 11, a major commercial route in the province. The Mi’kmaq claimed officers pointed guns at them, but the DFO denied the allegations, saying that only pepper spray was used and one baton pulled out. With Burnt Church fishermen continuing their lobster catch, Dhaliwal said fisheries officers would continue to seize traps and make arrests. But he also called the native leaders to return to the negotiating table, claiming the Burnt Church band refused to even meet with his federal negotiator. 2001 season Hoping to avoid a repeat of the violence of the previous year’s fishing season, the federal government issued the Burnt Church Mi’kmaq a temporary license when the season opened Aug. 20, 2001. The plan was to allow Native fishing to go ahead while a long-term agreement was negotiated. However, the license came with limitations that didn’t sit well with the Mi’kmaq. Band member Brian Bartibogue called it another case of the federal government “ramming legislation down aboriginal people’s throats.” The license restricted the fishermen from selling their catch, limiting them to using it for food and ceremonial purposes only. Department of Fisheries and Oceans tags had to be on the catch. Most importantly, the license would only last one week, until midnight on Aug. 27, 2001. Shortly after issuing the license, the federal government released a study that suggested fishing in the fall jeopardizes the resource. Ottawa proposed allowing the Mi’kmaq to use small boats to set 900 traps for two months every fall as well as creating 50 jobs on the reserve to study the long-term effects of the lobster fishery. With pressure building on the day before the deadline, Burnt Church band members blocked all entrances to their reserve and escorted media out of the area while continuing to set lobster traps on Miramichi Bay. The RCMP sent extra officers to the area and non-Native fishermen again called on Ottawa not to allow the Mi’kmaq to fish under different rules. After the deadline passed with no agreement with the Mi’kmaq, Ottawa issued a new license to allow fishing for food and ceremonial purposes, which lasted until Oct. 20, 2001. Federal report In April 2002, a federal committee released a report aimed at preventing more outbreaks of violence between native and non-Native fishermen. The report recommended that all charges stemming from the confrontation be dropped and Ottawa should compensate fishermen for their lost traps and boats. The committee recommended that Native fishermen have the same season as non-native fishermen, meaning Natives would be banned from fishing in the fall. As well, the report recommended that Native bands be issued licenses, which they would distribute to Native fishermen. |